CPER vs. UNL
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL).
CPER and UNL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPER is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return. It was launched on Nov 15, 2011. UNL is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the 12 Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Nov 18, 2009. Both CPER and UNL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CPER vs. UNL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPER vs. UNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | -1.77% | 38.95% | 4.23% | 4.55% | -15.14% | 25.21% | 23.90% | 6.66% | -21.91% | 28.80% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | -8.13% | -9.67% | -4.78% | -50.20% | 47.01% | 54.42% | -9.54% | -18.78% | 12.53% | -21.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPER achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly higher than UNL's -8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CPER has outperformed UNL with an annualized return of 9.08%, while UNL has yielded a comparatively lower -2.62% annualized return.
CPER
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 8.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.25%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
UNL
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -8.13%
- 6M
- -15.46%
- 1Y
- -32.00%
- 3Y*
- -16.34%
- 5Y*
- -3.07%
- 10Y*
- -2.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPER vs. UNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPER has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than UNL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CPER vs. UNL — Risk / Return Rank
CPER
UNL
CPER vs. UNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPER | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | -0.82 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | -1.03 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.87 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | -0.93 | +1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | -1.53 | +2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPER | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | -0.82 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | -0.07 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | -0.08 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.39 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPER and UNL is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CPER vs. UNL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPER nor UNL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CPER vs. UNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPER drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum UNL drawdown of -88.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPER and UNL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPER | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.04% | -88.52% | +34.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -36.28% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.75% | -77.17% | +42.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.42% | -77.17% | +38.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.29% | -87.99% | +76.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -73.20% | +47.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.19% | 22.12% | -9.93% |
Volatility
CPER vs. UNL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) is 9.07%, while United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) has a volatility of 11.07%. This indicates that CPER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPER | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 11.07% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.93% | 32.27% | -10.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.82% | 39.11% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 41.69% | -14.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 33.81% | -9.95% |