CPER vs. SLV
CPER (United States Copper Index Fund) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - CPER is a Copper fund tracking the SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CPER returned 11.25%/yr vs 14.35%/yr for SLV. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPER charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
CPER vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPER achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CPER has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 11.25%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.35% annualized return.
CPER
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 19.61%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
SLV
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 92.51%
- 3Y*
- 41.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
CPER vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | 13.42% | 38.95% | 4.23% | 4.55% | -15.14% | 25.21% | 23.90% | 6.66% | -21.91% | 28.80% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -1.47% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPER and SLV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.39 |
The correlation between CPER and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPER vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
CPER
SLV
CPER vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPER | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.05 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 4.41 | -1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPER vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPER drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPER and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPER | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.04% | -76.28% | +22.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.77% | -45.40% | +20.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.77% | -45.40% | +20.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.75% | -45.40% | +10.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.42% | -45.40% | +6.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -39.90% | +37.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.35% | -44.66% | +19.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.95% | 21.03% | -9.08% |
Volatility
CPER vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) is 10.05%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.50%. This indicates that CPER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPER | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.05% | 16.50% | -6.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.31% | 59.14% | -35.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.88% | 60.02% | -25.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 36.51% | -9.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 32.02% | -7.93% |
CPER vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPER has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPER vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPER nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPER and SLV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.50%) compared to CPER (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPER dropped -54.04% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 14.35% vs 11.25% for CPER. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CPER has been the lower-risk option at 10.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 14.35% return vs 11.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for CPER.
CPER and SLV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CPER is categorized as Copper, while SLV is Silver. CPER tracks SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: USCF and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for CPER and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPER and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer