CPER vs. IBM

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

CPER (United States Copper Index Fund) is Copper fund tracking the SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return, while IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CPER returned 10.14%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for IBM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CPER vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPER achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -27.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CPER has outperformed IBM with an annualized return of 10.14%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.64% annualized return.

CPER

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 6.90%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 10.14%
• ALL TIME*: 2.94%

IBM

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -14.49%
• 6M: -29.40%
• YTD: -27.15%
• 1Y: -23.58%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: 7.64%
• ALL TIME*: 7.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPER vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPER United States Copper Index Fund	9.90%	38.95%	4.23%	4.55%	-15.14%	25.21%	23.90%	6.66%	-21.91%	28.80%
IBM International Business Machines Corporation	-27.15%	38.23%	39.27%	21.85%	10.64%	16.65%	-1.16%	23.58%	-22.56%	-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CPER and IBM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011	0.19

Return for Risk

CPER vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPER

CPER Risk / Return Rank: 17
CPER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CPER Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CPER Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CPER Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CPER Martin Ratio Rank: 16

IBM

IBM Risk / Return Rank: 19
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 23
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPER vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPER	IBM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	-0.49	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	-0.38	+0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.94	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	-0.66	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.90	-1.53	+2.43

CPER vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPER Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPER and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPER vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPER drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum IBM drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPER and IBM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPER	IBM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.04%	-69.40%	+15.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.77%	-35.85%	+11.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.77%	-35.85%	+11.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.75%	-35.85%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.42%	-40.59%	+2.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.37%	-35.30%	+29.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.24%	-20.12%	-5.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.13%	15.44%	-3.31%

Volatility

CPER vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) is 6.94%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 32.02%. This indicates that CPER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPER	IBM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.94%	32.02%	-25.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.89%	46.34%	-24.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.16%	48.36%	-14.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.10%	29.86%	-2.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.08%	27.97%	-3.89%

Dividends

CPER vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

CPER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPER United States Copper Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBM International Business Machines Corporation	3.16%	2.27%	3.03%	4.05%	4.68%	4.74%	5.17%	4.80%	5.46%	3.85%	3.31%	3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPER and IBM in my portfolio?

CPER and IBM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPER or IBM?

IBM has higher volatility (32.02%) compared to CPER (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPER dropped -54.04% vs IBM's -69.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.