CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CPD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF) and ZUP.TO (BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF) are both Preferred Stock funds - CPD.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Preferred Share TR while ZUP.TO tracks the Solactive US Preferred Share Select Index (NTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CPD.TO returned 6.22%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for ZUP.TO. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO) and BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF (ZUP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPD.TO achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than ZUP.TO's 3.28% return.

CPD.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.98%
• 6M: 6.75%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 1Y: 12.10%
• 3Y*: 16.67%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: 6.35%
• ALL TIME*: 3.23%

ZUP.TO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -2.54%
• 6M: 1.65%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 1Y: 3.67%
• 3Y*: 7.79%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF	CA$659.53K	CA$658.15K	CA$644.06K
ZUP.TO BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF	CA$5.87K	CA$8.06K	CA$11.58K

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF	6.46%	16.10%	23.31%	6.23%	-19.19%	18.85%	5.35%	3.35%	-9.05%	8.12%
ZUP.TO BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF	3.28%	-4.11%	17.52%	3.56%	-14.25%	4.80%	7.69%	11.34%	1.93%	0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CPD.TO and ZUP.TO is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2017	0.10

Return for Risk

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPD.TO

CPD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CPD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CPD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CPD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CPD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CPD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ZUP.TO

ZUP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 23
ZUP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ZUP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ZUP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ZUP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ZUP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO) and BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF (ZUP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPD.TO	ZUP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	0.54	+2.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	0.85	+2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.10	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	0.96	+3.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.52	1.89	+19.63

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the ZUP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPD.TO and ZUP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPD.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.92%, which is greater than ZUP.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPD.TO and ZUP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPD.TO	ZUP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.92%	-32.93%	-7.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-4.76%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.57%	-12.88%	+5.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.12%	-25.34%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-4.37%	+4.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.70%	-5.33%	-1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	2.42%	-1.88%

Volatility

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO) is 0.73%, while BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF (ZUP.TO) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that CPD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZUP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPD.TO	ZUP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	2.49%	-1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	6.03%	-3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	8.50%	-4.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.69%	11.81%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.57%	14.37%	-3.80%

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPD.TO and ZUP.TO have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

CPD.TO vs. ZUP.TO - Dividend Comparison

CPD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than ZUP.TO's 5.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF	4.98%	4.96%	5.11%	5.88%	5.53%	4.17%	4.96%	5.02%	4.74%	4.33%	4.85%	5.44%
ZUP.TO BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF	5.58%	6.51%	5.82%	6.88%	6.33%	5.28%	5.81%	5.52%	5.29%	5.14%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPD.TO and ZUP.TO in my portfolio?

CPD.TO and ZUP.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CPD.TO or ZUP.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPD.TO or ZUP.TO?

CPD.TO and ZUP.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

What is the main difference between CPD.TO and ZUP.TO?

CPD.TO tracks S&P/TSX Preferred Share TR, while ZUP.TO tracks Solactive US Preferred Share Select Index (NTR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO.