PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (OILY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPCC.TO achieves a 23.82% return, which is significantly lower than OILY.TO's 35.40% return.


CPCC.TO

1D
-2.96%
1M
24.04%
YTD
23.82%
6M
30.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OILY.TO

1D
1.11%
1M
1.56%
YTD
35.40%
6M
30.26%
1Y
50.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPCC.TO and OILY.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPCC.TO

OILY.TO
OILY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
OILY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) and Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (OILY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPCC.TOOILY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

1.35

+0.63

Drawdowns

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, which is greater than OILY.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPCC.TO and OILY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPCC.TOOILY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.12%

-22.70%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-3.20%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-4.49%

-2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

Volatility

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPCC.TOOILY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.17%

19.34%

+23.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.17%

25.01%

+18.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.17%

25.01%

+18.16%

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than OILY.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPCC.TO vs. OILY.TO - Dividend Comparison

CPCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than OILY.TO's 12.68% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPCC.TO and OILY.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OILY.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OILY.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CPCC.TO.

CPCC.TO is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while OILY.TO is Energy Equities. CPCC.TO tracks Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index, while OILY.TO tracks Solactive Canada Energy Top 10 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CPCC.TO and 0.60% for OILY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPCC.TO and OILY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer