PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPAI vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPAI vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAI achieves a 26.83% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 17.65% return.


CPAI

1D
0.85%
1M
1.23%
YTD
26.83%
6M
25.15%
1Y
41.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPAI vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPAI and WNTR is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPAI vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPAI
CPAI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CPAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CPAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPAI vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPAIWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

2.73

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

6.99

+6.89

CPAI vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPAI and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPAI vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAI drawdown since its inception was -21.46%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAI and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPAIWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-42.65%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-42.65%

+32.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-4.02%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-20.87%

+17.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

16.66%

-13.68%

Volatility

CPAI vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) is 7.66%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that CPAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPAIWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

18.14%

-10.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.79%

46.41%

-30.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

53.16%

-34.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.45%

53.31%

-33.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

53.31%

-33.86%

CPAI vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPAI vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

CPAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
0.70%0.89%0.41%0.06%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
94.34%58.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPAI and WNTR have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to CPAI (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPAI dropped -21.46% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 41.30% for CPAI. On fees, CPAI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CPAI has been the lower-risk option at 7.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 41.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPAI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.70% for CPAI.

CPAI is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Funds and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CPAI and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPAI and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer