PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPAI vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CPAI vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CPAI vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
4.21%17.79%28.37%6.69%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
-12.16%22.99%63.97%2.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAI achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -12.16% return.


CPAI

1D
3.44%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
4.21%
6M
6.74%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
4.60%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-12.16%
6M
-9.36%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CPAI vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CPAI vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPAI
CPAI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CPAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CPAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPAI vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPAIMAGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

0.99

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.61

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.49

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.33

5.25

+2.09

CPAI vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPAI and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPAIMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.99

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

1.34

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between CPAI and MAGS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CPAI vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

CPAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than MAGS's 1.68% yield.


TTM202520242023
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
0.86%0.89%0.41%0.06%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.68%1.48%0.81%0.44%

Drawdowns

CPAI vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAI drawdown since its inception was -21.46%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAI and MAGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPAIMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-29.91%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-18.62%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-14.87%

+7.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-4.75%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

5.29%

-1.77%

Volatility

CPAI vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) is 7.88%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that CPAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPAIMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

8.36%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

15.45%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.20%

28.68%

-6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

26.29%

-7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

26.29%

-7.08%