PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CP9U.L achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than PAXJ.L's 8.70% return.


CP9U.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.91%
1Y
2.51%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*

PAXJ.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
8.70%
6M
12.99%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CP9U.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
1.91%12.86%0.61%
PAXJ.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF
8.70%20.68%6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CP9U.L and PAXJ.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.43

The correlation between CP9U.L and PAXJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CP9U.L
PAXJ.L

Financial Services

48.0%
46.1%

Real Estate

12.3%
7.8%

Industrials

11.3%
8.5%

Basic Materials

10.4%
14.6%

Healthcare

4.7%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.7%

Technology

2.2%
1.1%

Utilities

1.6%
3.6%

Energy

-

2.9%

Financial Services

CP9U.L
48.0%
PAXJ.L
46.1%

Real Estate

CP9U.L
12.3%
PAXJ.L
7.8%

Industrials

CP9U.L
11.3%
PAXJ.L
8.5%

Basic Materials

CP9U.L
10.4%
PAXJ.L
14.6%

Healthcare

CP9U.L
4.7%
PAXJ.L
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CP9U.L
3.9%
PAXJ.L
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

CP9U.L
3.1%
PAXJ.L
3.0%

Communication Services

CP9U.L
2.5%
PAXJ.L
2.7%

Technology

CP9U.L
2.2%
PAXJ.L
1.1%

Utilities

CP9U.L
1.6%
PAXJ.L
3.6%

Energy

CP9U.L

-

PAXJ.L
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CP9U.L
CP9U.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CP9U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXJ.L
PAXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CP9U.LPAXJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.35

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

3.98

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.01

11.17

-10.16

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CP9U.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CP9U.L and PAXJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CP9U.LPAXJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.99

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

1.93

-1.66

Drawdowns

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CP9U.L drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than PAXJ.L's maximum drawdown of -17.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP9U.L and PAXJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CP9U.LPAXJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.03%

-17.04%

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.58%

-8.61%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-3.31%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-2.57%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

Volatility

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CP9U.LPAXJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.50%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

11.52%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

17.28%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.99%

27.08%

-5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.12%

27.08%

+0.04%

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CP9U.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXJ.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

CP9U.L vs. PAXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

CP9U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%.


PositionTTM20252024
CP9U.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAXJ.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF
3.08%3.34%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


CP9U.L and PAXJ.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXJ.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CP9U.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CP9U.L and 0.12% for PAXJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CP9U.L and PAXJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer