CP9G.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CP9G.L (Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both exchange-traded funds - CP9G.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while PACW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CP9G.L returned 4.18% vs 30.29% for PACW.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CP9G.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CP9G.L is traded in GBp, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CP9G.L achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.

CP9G.L

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: 2.90%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: 5.57%

PACW.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CP9G.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR	2.12%	2.55%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	11.92%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CP9G.L and PACW.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CP9G.L

CP9G.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CP9G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CP9G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CP9G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
CP9G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CP9G.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	2.89	-2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	3.95	-3.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.55	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	4.27	-3.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.44	17.43	-15.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CP9G.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CP9G.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	2.89	-2.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	1.24	-0.84

Drawdowns

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CP9G.L drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP9G.L and PACW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CP9G.L	PACW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.32%	-17.68%	-14.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.26%	-7.06%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.85%	-0.46%	-5.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.04%	-3.02%	-3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	1.73%	+1.18%

Volatility

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that CP9G.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CP9G.L	PACW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	2.93%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.42%	7.75%	+2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.62%	10.42%	+2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	13.91%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.70%	13.91%	+1.79%

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CP9G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

CP9G.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

CP9G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.

Position	TTM
CP9G.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR	0.00%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CP9G.L and PACW.L in my portfolio?

CP9G.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CP9G.L or PACW.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CP9G.L or PACW.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CP9G.L.

What is the main difference between CP9G.L and PACW.L?

CP9G.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PACW.L is Global Equities. CP9G.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CP9G.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.