CP vs. AENA.MC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CP (Canadian Pacific Railway Limited) and AENA.MC (Aena SA) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CP in Railroads, AENA.MC in Airports & Air Services. Over the past 10 years, CP returned 14.29%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for AENA.MC. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CP vs. AENA.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) and Aena SA (AENA.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CP is traded in USD, while AENA.MC is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AENA.MC values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CP achieves a 22.56% return, which is significantly higher than AENA.MC's 4.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CP has outperformed AENA.MC with an annualized return of 14.29%, while AENA.MC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.

CP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: 22.56%
• 6M: 22.02%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: 6.45%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: 14.29%

AENA.MC

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 9.19%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: 26.66%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CP vs. AENA.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited	22.56%	2.60%	-7.84%	6.85%	4.71%	4.64%	37.33%	45.04%	-1.81%	29.32%
AENA.MC Aena SA	4.83%	42.03%	16.87%	48.04%	-20.14%	-9.52%	-9.22%	27.52%	-21.03%	51.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CP and AENA.MC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2015	0.23

Return for Risk

CP vs. AENA.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CP

CP Risk / Return Rank: 55
CP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CP Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CP Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

AENA.MC

AENA.MC Risk / Return Rank: 46
AENA.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
AENA.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
AENA.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AENA.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AENA.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CP vs. AENA.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) and Aena SA (AENA.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CP	AENA.MC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	0.29	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	0.56	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.07	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	0.35	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.29	0.75	+0.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CP vs. AENA.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CP Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the AENA.MC Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CP and AENA.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CP	AENA.MC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	0.29	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.52	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.35	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.50	-0.16

Drawdowns

CP vs. AENA.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CP drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, which is greater than AENA.MC's maximum drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP and AENA.MC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CP	AENA.MC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.17%	-51.72%	-17.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.23%	-19.57%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.88%	-19.57%	-6.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.88%	-43.36%	+17.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.70%	-51.72%	+18.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-14.12%	+12.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.30%	-14.03%	-6.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.50%	9.19%	-0.69%

Volatility

CP vs. AENA.MC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) is 6.15%, while Aena SA (AENA.MC) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that CP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AENA.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CP	AENA.MC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	8.36%	-2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.44%	18.21%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.51%	23.57%	-1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.46%	25.52%	-1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.64%	28.23%	-2.59%

Dividends

CP vs. AENA.MC - Dividend Comparison

CP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than AENA.MC's 3.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AENA.MC Aena SA	3.62%	3.32%	3.14%	2.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.29%	3.88%	1.84%	1.69%	0.00%
CP Canadian Pacific Railway Limited	0.74%	0.86%	0.76%	0.78%	0.96%	0.84%	0.76%	0.93%	1.07%	0.92%	0.98%	0.98%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CP and AENA.MC in my portfolio?

CP and AENA.MC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.