COZX vs. PATX
COZX (Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF) and PATX (Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. COZX is actively managed, while PATX is passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COZX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for PATX.
Performance
COZX vs. PATX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COZX
- 1D
- -15.49%
- 1M
- -47.58%
- 6M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- 46.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PATX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 27.84%
- 6M
- -48.00%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COZX vs. PATX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF | 4.15% |
PATX Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF | -61.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between COZX and PATX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COZX vs. PATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX) and Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF (PATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COZX vs. PATX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COZX drawdown since its inception was -70.44%, smaller than the maximum PATX drawdown of -74.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COZX and PATX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COZX | PATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.44% | -74.56% | +4.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.05% | -61.98% | +9.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.75% | -60.78% | +20.03% |
Volatility
COZX vs. PATX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COZX | PATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.78% | 116.56% | +23.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 139.78% | 116.56% | +23.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 139.78% | 116.56% | +23.22% |
COZX vs. PATX - Expense Ratio Comparison
COZX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PATX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
COZX vs. PATX - Dividend Comparison
Neither COZX nor PATX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COZX and PATX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COZX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COZX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for PATX.
COZX and PATX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for COZX and 1.49% for PATX.
Find the right allocation for COZX and PATX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer