COZX vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COZX (Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

COZX vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COZX achieves a 205.40% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 234.92% return.

COZX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 78.54%
• YTD: 205.40%
• 6M: 125.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 5.72%
• 1M: 71.41%
• YTD: 234.92%
• 6M: 277.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COZX vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF	205.40%	-61.63%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	234.92%	3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between COZX and LRCU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

COZX vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COZX	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	13.66	-13.42

Drawdowns

COZX vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COZX drawdown since its inception was -70.37%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COZX and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	COZX	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.37%	-40.09%	-30.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	0.00%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.31%	-9.38%	-34.93%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COZX	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.53%	109.47%	+29.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	138.53%	109.47%	+29.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	138.53%	109.47%	+29.06%

COZX vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COZX and LRCU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

COZX vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

Neither COZX nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COZX and LRCU in my portfolio?

COZX and LRCU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COZX or LRCU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COZX or LRCU?

COZX and LRCU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COZX or LRCU?

COZX and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.