COYY vs. FUMB
COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) and FUMB (First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FUMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. COYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FUMB.
Performance
COYY vs. FUMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -29.65% return, which is significantly lower than FUMB's 1.07% return.
COYY
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- -29.65%
- 6M
- -39.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUMB
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 2.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.96%
- 10Y*
- —
COYY vs. FUMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | -29.65% | -38.98% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 1.07% | 0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between COYY and FUMB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COYY vs. FUMB — Risk / Return Rank
COYY
FUMB
COYY vs. FUMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COYY | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.74 | 1.00 | -2.75 |
Drawdowns
COYY vs. FUMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -58.58%, which is greater than FUMB's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and FUMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COYY | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.58% | -2.68% | -55.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.58% | -0.03% | -58.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -0.19% | -35.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
COYY vs. FUMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COYY | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.39% | 0.76% | +35.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 1.16% | +35.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 1.77% | +34.62% |
COYY vs. FUMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
COYY vs. FUMB - Dividend Comparison
COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 386.46%, more than FUMB's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | 386.46% | 132.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 2.80% | 2.90% | 2.86% | 2.24% | 1.02% | 0.43% | 0.94% | 1.74% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COYY and FUMB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.
COYY has the higher dividend yield at 386.46%, compared with 2.80% for FUMB.
COYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FUMB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 0.45% for FUMB.
Find the right allocation for COYY and FUMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer