COYY vs. CSHP
COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. COYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
COYY vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -30.87% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.83% return.
COYY
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- -30.87%
- 6M
- -36.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COYY vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | -30.87% | -40.04% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.83% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between COYY and CSHP is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COYY vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
COYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSHP
COYY vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COYY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 6.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 65.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 381.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COYY vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COYY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.60% | -0.08% | -59.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.30% | -0.04% | -59.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.43% | -0.00% | -36.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
COYY vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COYY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.41% | 0.36% | +35.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.41% | 0.41% | +35.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.41% | 0.41% | +35.00% |
COYY vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
COYY vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 414.70%, more than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | 414.70% | 132.14% | 0.00% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COYY and CSHP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.
COYY has the higher dividend yield at 414.70%, compared with 3.91% for CSHP.
COYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 0.20% for CSHP.
Find the right allocation for COYY and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer