PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWG vs. TPLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWG vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWG achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than TPLC's 8.78% return.


COWG

1D
0.07%
1M
8.17%
YTD
12.50%
6M
12.76%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
10Y*

TPLC

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.66%
YTD
8.78%
6M
7.78%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWG vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
12.50%10.24%34.99%20.69%-0.68%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
8.78%7.08%13.10%15.17%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between COWG and TPLC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2022

0.78

The correlation between COWG and TPLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

COWG vs. TPLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COWG
TPLC

Technology

48.5%
16.7%

Healthcare

21.0%
9.3%

Energy

8.4%
8.2%

Basic Materials

6.5%
5.9%

Communication Services

5.2%
0.2%

Industrials

3.6%
23.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
3.8%

Utilities

1.5%
11.6%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Technology

COWG
48.5%
TPLC
16.7%

Healthcare

COWG
21.0%
TPLC
9.3%

Energy

COWG
8.4%
TPLC
8.2%

Basic Materials

COWG
6.5%
TPLC
5.9%

Communication Services

COWG
5.2%
TPLC
0.2%

Industrials

COWG
3.6%
TPLC
23.2%

Consumer Cyclical

COWG
3.2%
TPLC
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

COWG
2.0%
TPLC
3.8%

Utilities

COWG
1.5%
TPLC
11.6%

Financial Services

COWG

-

TPLC
11.8%

Real Estate

COWG

-

TPLC
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWG vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWG
COWG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWG vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWGTPLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.67

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.64

5.94

-2.29

COWG vs. TPLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWG Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the TPLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWG and TPLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWGTPLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.10

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.56

+0.62

Drawdowns

COWG vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWG drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum TPLC drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWG and TPLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWGTPLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-38.02%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-7.58%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.60%

-18.18%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-5.29%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

2.13%

+1.54%

Volatility

COWG vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) at 2.70%. This indicates that COWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWGTPLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

2.70%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

8.45%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

11.50%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

16.14%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

19.89%

-0.78%

COWG vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

COWG vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison

COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than TPLC's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.30%0.32%0.40%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.84%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWG and TPLC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWG has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to TPLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWG dropped -23.60% vs TPLC's -38.02%.

On 3-year performance, COWG leads with 24.53% vs 13.91% for TPLC. On fees, COWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, COWG has performed better with a 24.53% return vs 13.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.

TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.30% for COWG.

COWG tracks Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index, while TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWG and 0.52% for TPLC.

TPLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWG and TPLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer