COWG vs. SRVR
COWG (Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COWG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, COWG returned 22.52%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for SRVR. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COWG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
COWG vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWG achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 16.03% return.
COWG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 8.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- 16.03%
- 6M
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
COWG vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 7.28% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 16.03% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWG and SRVR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | 0.50 |
The correlation between COWG and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWG vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
COWG
SRVR
COWG vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COWG | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 0.22 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | 0.46 | +1.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COWG vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWG drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWG and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWG | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -40.99% | +17.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -14.78% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.60% | -18.34% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.64% | -15.04% | +10.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -15.24% | +11.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 6.96% | -3.23% |
Volatility
COWG vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) at 5.86%. This indicates that COWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWG | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 5.86% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | 13.71% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 17.27% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 19.79% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 21.44% | -2.18% |
COWG vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
COWG vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SRVR's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.63% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWG and SRVR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWG has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to SRVR (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWG dropped -23.60% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 3-year performance, COWG leads with 22.52% vs 8.33% for SRVR. On fees, COWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COWG has performed better with a 22.52% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.38% for COWG.
COWG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SRVR is REIT. COWG tracks Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWG and 0.60% for SRVR.
COWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWG and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer