PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTZX vs. QEVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTZX vs. QEVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) and Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTZX achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than QEVOX's 55.72% return.


COTZX

1D
0.05%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.49%
6M
3.53%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
7.44%

QEVOX

1D
0.64%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
55.72%
6M
61.52%
1Y
80.19%
3Y*
23.75%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTZX vs. QEVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
COTZX
Columbia Thermostat Fund
3.49%15.02%7.98%11.66%-12.92%6.44%29.61%3.20%
QEVOX
Quantified Evolution Plus Fund
55.72%8.67%14.79%1.22%-24.02%14.49%-1.82%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between COTZX and QEVOX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2019

0.30

The correlation between COTZX and QEVOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTZX vs. QEVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTZX
COTZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
COTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
COTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
COTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
COTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QEVOX
QEVOX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QEVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QEVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTZX vs. QEVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) and Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COTZXQEVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.56

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

6.35

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.24

24.92

-9.68

COTZX vs. QEVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COTZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the QEVOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COTZX and QEVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COTZXQEVOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

3.25

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.49

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.36

+0.29

Drawdowns

COTZX vs. QEVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTZX drawdown since its inception was -47.48%, which is greater than QEVOX's maximum drawdown of -28.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTZX and QEVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTZXQEVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.48%

-28.47%

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.02%

-12.69%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.93%

-21.21%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.80%

-27.40%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.75%

+8.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-13.87%

+10.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

3.23%

-2.38%

Volatility

COTZX vs. QEVOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) is 1.60%, while Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that COTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QEVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTZXQEVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

6.32%

-4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.96%

21.58%

-17.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.06%

24.81%

-19.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.33%

20.01%

-12.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.39%

21.72%

-14.33%

COTZX vs. QEVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTZX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than QEVOX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

COTZX vs. QEVOX - Dividend Comparison

COTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than QEVOX's 42.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COTZX
Columbia Thermostat Fund
3.25%3.37%3.55%2.74%3.28%14.82%6.92%5.57%4.45%3.13%2.66%4.26%
QEVOX
Quantified Evolution Plus Fund
42.60%66.34%10.32%24.53%0.07%13.55%2.29%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COTZX and QEVOX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QEVOX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to COTZX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COTZX dropped -47.48% vs QEVOX's -28.47%.

QEVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTZX and QEVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer