COTZX vs. CRTOX
COTZX (Columbia Thermostat Fund) and CRTOX (Potomac Tactical Opportunities Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, COTZX returned 4.79%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for CRTOX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COTZX charges 0.24%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for CRTOX.
Performance
COTZX vs. CRTOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTZX achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than CRTOX's 9.26% return.
COTZX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
CRTOX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- —
COTZX vs. CRTOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | 3.49% | 15.02% | 7.98% | 11.66% | -12.92% | 6.44% | 12.31% |
CRTOX Potomac Tactical Opportunities Fund | 9.26% | 11.98% | 8.39% | 15.76% | -14.53% | -2.00% | 19.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTZX and CRTOX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | 0.53 |
The correlation between COTZX and CRTOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (5 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTZX vs. CRTOX — Risk / Return Rank
COTZX
CRTOX
COTZX vs. CRTOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) and Potomac Tactical Opportunities Fund (CRTOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COTZX | CRTOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.42 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.80 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.24 | 9.26 | +5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COTZX | CRTOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 1.97 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.00 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.00 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
COTZX vs. CRTOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTZX drawdown since its inception was -47.48%, smaller than the maximum CRTOX drawdown of -98.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTZX and CRTOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTZX | CRTOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.48% | -98.92% | +51.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.02% | -9.93% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.93% | -98.92% | +91.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.80% | -98.92% | +81.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -98.48% | +98.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -32.62% | +29.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 3.00% | -2.15% |
Volatility
COTZX vs. CRTOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) is 1.60%, while Potomac Tactical Opportunities Fund (CRTOX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that COTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRTOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTZX | CRTOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 4.31% | -2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.96% | 10.79% | -6.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.06% | 14.17% | -9.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 3,567.72% | -3,560.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 3,279.18% | -3,271.79% |
COTZX vs. CRTOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTZX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CRTOX's 1.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
COTZX vs. CRTOX - Dividend Comparison
COTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than CRTOX's 11.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.55% | 2.74% | 3.28% | 14.82% | 6.92% | 5.57% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 2.66% | 4.26% |
CRTOX Potomac Tactical Opportunities Fund | 11.25% | 12.29% | 4.58% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 15.16% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COTZX and CRTOX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRTOX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to COTZX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COTZX dropped -47.48% vs CRTOX's -98.92%.
COTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COTZX and CRTOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer