PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTN.L vs. COPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTN.L vs. COPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTN.L achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than COPA.L's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, COTN.L has underperformed COPA.L with an annualized return of 1.32%, while COPA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.


COTN.L

1D
-2.76%
1M
-11.68%
YTD
9.87%
6M
10.29%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
-7.96%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
1.32%

COPA.L

1D
0.27%
1M
9.03%
YTD
13.93%
6M
21.07%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTN.L vs. COPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COTN.L
WisdomTree Cotton
9.87%-11.34%-16.60%-1.06%-8.04%41.68%7.77%-7.05%-7.59%10.38%
COPA.L
WisdomTree Copper
13.93%36.37%4.81%2.66%-13.58%24.36%21.41%4.90%-20.37%26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between COTN.L and COPA.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2007

0.23

The correlation between COTN.L and COPA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTN.L vs. COPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTN.L
COTN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
COTN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COTN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
COTN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
COTN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
COTN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

COPA.L
COPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
COPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTN.L vs. COPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COTN.LCOPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.22

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

1.19

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

2.57

-1.94

COTN.L vs. COPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COTN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the COPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COTN.L and COPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COTN.LCOPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.91

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.27

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.44

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.09

-0.09

Drawdowns

COTN.L vs. COPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTN.L drawdown since its inception was -73.59%, which is greater than COPA.L's maximum drawdown of -67.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTN.L and COPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTN.LCOPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.59%

-67.44%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-25.25%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.70%

-25.25%

-18.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.70%

-34.64%

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.70%

-38.75%

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.25%

-2.26%

-54.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.78%

-33.24%

-16.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

11.73%

-5.16%

Volatility

COTN.L vs. COPA.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) at 8.83%. This indicates that COTN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTN.LCOPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.54%

8.83%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

18.91%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

33.17%

-16.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.57%

26.20%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

23.28%

+1.78%

COTN.L vs. COPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COTN.L and COPA.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

COTN.L vs. COPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COTN.L nor COPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COTN.L and COPA.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTN.L and COPA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

COTN.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while COPA.L is Metals. COTN.L tracks Bloomberg Cotton, while COPA.L tracks Bloomberg Copper Subindex.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTN.L and COPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer