COTG vs. ERX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX).

COTG and ERX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COTG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 18, 2025. ERX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). It was launched on Apr 1, 2020.

Performance

COTG vs. ERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COTG vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	29.11%	-21.71%
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares	71.72%	0.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 29.11% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 71.72% return.

COTG

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: 29.11%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ERX

• 1D: -7.39%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: 71.72%
• 6M: 71.12%
• 1Y: 48.19%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: 34.47%
• 10Y*: -6.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.

ERX

Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares

COTG

Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

Return for Risk

COTG vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERX

ERX Risk / Return Rank: 48
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTG vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COTG	ERX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	-0.09	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between COTG and ERX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

COTG vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison

COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares	1.56%	2.54%	2.94%	3.17%	2.23%	2.16%	2.35%	1.56%	3.10%	0.85%

Drawdowns

COTG vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and ERX.

Drawdown Indicators

	COTG	ERX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.44%	-99.54%	+76.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-35.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.89%	-91.33%	+85.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.60%	-66.78%	+58.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COTG	ERX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.64%	50.15%	-11.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.64%	52.18%	-13.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.64%	69.25%	-30.61%