COST.TO vs. WMT.DE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) and Walmart Inc (WMT.DE).

Performance

COST.TO vs. WMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) and Walmart Inc (WMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COST.TO vs. WMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
COST.TO Costco CDR (CAD Hedged)	15.04%	-7.82%	37.46%	47.35%	-20.01%	5.93%
WMT.DE Walmart Inc	12.61%	18.44%	90.22%	10.06%	7.42%	1.49%

Different Trading Currencies

COST.TO is traded in CAD, while WMT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WMT.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST.TO achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly higher than WMT.DE's 12.61% return.

COST.TO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 15.04%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: 3.25%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WMT.DE

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 19.81%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 39.10%
• 5Y*: 26.33%
• 10Y*: 21.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

COST.TO vs. WMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST.TO

COST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
COST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
COST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
COST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
COST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
COST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

WMT.DE

WMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
WMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
WMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
WMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
WMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST.TO vs. WMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) and Walmart Inc (WMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COST.TO	WMT.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.59	-1.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	2.40	-2.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.29	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	3.69	-3.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.50	9.47	-8.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COST.TO vs. WMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COST.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the WMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST.TO and WMT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COST.TO	WMT.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	1.59	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.74	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between COST.TO and WMT.DE is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

COST.TO vs. WMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

COST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than WMT.DE's 0.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST.TO Costco CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.53%	0.59%	0.50%	2.88%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WMT.DE Walmart Inc	0.66%	0.75%	0.98%	1.27%	1.38%	1.29%	1.40%	1.53%	1.91%	1.90%	2.37%	2.81%

Drawdowns

COST.TO vs. WMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, roughly equal to the maximum WMT.DE drawdown of -31.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST.TO and WMT.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	COST.TO	WMT.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.60%	-58.98%	+27.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.34%	-8.45%	-11.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.69%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.52%	-4.81%	-4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	-21.94%	+11.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.30%	4.09%	+6.21%

Volatility

COST.TO vs. WMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) is 4.22%, while Walmart Inc (WMT.DE) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that COST.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COST.TO	WMT.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	7.01%	-2.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.12%	18.35%	-5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.94%	24.92%	-4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.48%	20.86%	+2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.48%	21.91%	+1.57%

Financials