COST.TO vs. ^NDX
COST.TO (Costco CDR (CAD Hedged)) is a stock, while ^NDX (NASDAQ 100 Index) is an index. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
COST.TO vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COST.TO is traded in CAD, while ^NDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^NDX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST.TO achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's 16.49% return.
COST.TO
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
^NDX
- 1D
- -4.57%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COST.TO vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COST.TO Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) | 12.19% | -15.93% |
^NDX NASDAQ 100 Index | 16.49% | 16.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST.TO and ^NDX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST.TO vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank
COST.TO
^NDX
COST.TO vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COST.TO | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COST.TO | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 2.18 | -1.60 |
Drawdowns
COST.TO vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, which is greater than ^NDX's maximum drawdown of -12.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST.TO and ^NDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST.TO | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -12.46% | -19.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.76% | -5.00% | -6.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -2.65% | -7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.26% | — | — |
Volatility
COST.TO vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST.TO | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 16.44% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.52% | 16.44% | +7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.52% | 16.44% | +7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COST.TO and ^NDX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for COST.TO and ^NDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer