COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO).

XEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019.

Performance

COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
COST.TO Costco CDR (CAD Hedged)	15.04%	-7.82%	37.46%	47.35%	-20.01%	5.93%
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio	1.51%	19.47%	24.36%	17.25%	-11.01%	2.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST.TO achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly higher than XEQT.TO's 1.51% return.

COST.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 15.04%
• 6M: 7.70%
• 1Y: 2.33%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XEQT.TO

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -3.50%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 2.89%
• 1Y: 21.17%
• 3Y*: 18.44%
• 5Y*: 11.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST.TO

COST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 41
COST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
COST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
COST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
COST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
COST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

XEQT.TO

XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COST.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	1.33	-1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	1.85	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.29	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	1.79	-1.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.31	7.98	-7.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COST.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST.TO and XEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COST.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	1.33	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.86	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between COST.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

COST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than XEQT.TO's 1.64% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
COST.TO Costco CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.53%	0.59%	0.50%	2.88%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio	1.64%	1.66%	2.01%	2.07%	2.12%	1.64%	1.66%	1.19%

Drawdowns

COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST.TO and XEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	COST.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.60%	-29.74%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.34%	-11.78%	-8.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.52%	-4.27%	-5.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	-4.20%	-6.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.31%	2.64%	+7.67%

Volatility

COST.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Costco CDR (CAD Hedged) (COST.TO) is 4.19%, while iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that COST.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COST.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	5.77%	-1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	9.49%	+3.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.86%	15.99%	+3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.47%	13.03%	+10.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.47%	15.63%	+7.84%