PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSNX vs. CIGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSNX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Overseas Core Fund (COSNX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSNX achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 34.54% return.


COSNX

1D
0.52%
1M
2.49%
YTD
8.48%
6M
11.18%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*

CIGIX

1D
0.26%
1M
13.78%
YTD
34.54%
6M
37.88%
1Y
48.17%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSNX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
COSNX
Columbia Overseas Core Fund
8.48%38.31%3.42%15.51%-14.92%9.60%8.65%25.39%-17.16%
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
34.54%23.11%12.51%15.33%-30.54%-8.98%44.95%29.69%-22.94%

Correlation

The correlation between COSNX and CIGIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2018

0.87

The correlation between COSNX and CIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSNX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSNX
COSNX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
COSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
COSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CIGIX
CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSNX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Overseas Core Fund (COSNX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COSNXCIGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

3.01

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

11.14

-3.11

COSNX vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSNX and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSNXCIGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

2.09

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.23

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.38

+0.08

Drawdowns

COSNX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSNX drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSNX and CIGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSNXCIGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.68%

-64.46%

+27.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-15.88%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.43%

-19.38%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-50.15%

+18.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

0.00%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-15.29%

+7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

4.28%

-1.09%

Volatility

COSNX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Overseas Core Fund (COSNX) is 3.80%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that COSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSNXCIGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

9.54%

-5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

19.73%

-8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

22.82%

-8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

21.07%

-5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

19.98%

-2.61%

COSNX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSNX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSNX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

COSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, less than CIGIX's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGIX
Calamos International Growth Fund
10.02%13.49%4.54%0.28%0.00%0.33%5.42%0.00%13.25%3.76%0.00%0.13%
COSNX
Columbia Overseas Core Fund
8.80%9.55%4.25%4.59%1.46%8.15%2.25%3.80%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSNX and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGIX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to COSNX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSNX dropped -36.68% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSNX and CIGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer