CORP vs. LTPZ
CORP (PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF) and LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CORP is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Corporate, while LTPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CORP returned 2.81%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for LTPZ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
CORP vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORP achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than LTPZ's 0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CORP has outperformed LTPZ with an annualized return of 2.81%, while LTPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.80% annualized return.
CORP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
LTPZ
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- -0.63%
- 5Y*
- -4.88%
- 10Y*
- 0.80%
CORP vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORP PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF | 0.78% | 7.96% | 2.47% | 9.13% | -14.96% | -1.18% | 9.70% | 14.80% | -3.29% | 6.56% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 0.91% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 24.89% | 17.47% | -7.22% | 9.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORP and LTPZ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CORP and LTPZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORP vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
CORP
LTPZ
CORP vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (CORP) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CORP | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 0.56 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 0.85 | +1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 0.61 | +1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 1.34 | +5.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CORP | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 0.56 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | -0.31 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.05 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.21 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
CORP vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORP drawdown since its inception was -21.21%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORP and LTPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORP | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.21% | -40.99% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -7.00% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.06% | -16.27% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.21% | -40.99% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.21% | -40.99% | +19.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -32.41% | +31.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -12.40% | +8.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 3.19% | -2.31% |
Volatility
CORP vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (CORP) is 1.37%, while PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that CORP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORP | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 2.40% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 6.44% | -3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 9.29% | -5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.89% | 15.89% | -9.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 15.07% | -7.99% |
CORP vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CORP and LTPZ have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CORP vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
CORP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than LTPZ's 5.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORP PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF | 4.84% | 4.77% | 4.74% | 4.12% | 3.28% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 3.25% | 3.18% | 3.08% | 2.91% | 3.14% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 5.20% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORP and LTPZ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTPZ has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to CORP (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORP dropped -21.21% vs LTPZ's -40.99%.
On 10-year performance, CORP leads with 2.81% vs 0.80% for LTPZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, CORP has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CORP has performed better with a 2.81% return vs 0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CORP and LTPZ have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 4.84% for CORP.
CORP is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while LTPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. CORP tracks ICE BofA US Corporate, while LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y).
CORP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CORP and LTPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer