CORP vs. LQD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (CORP) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD).

CORP and LQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CORP is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Corporate. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both CORP and LQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CORP vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (CORP) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CORP vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CORP PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF	-0.32%	7.96%	2.47%	9.13%	-14.96%	-1.18%	9.70%	14.80%	-3.29%	6.56%
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	-0.38%	7.90%	0.86%	9.40%	-17.92%	-1.84%	10.97%	17.37%	-3.79%	7.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORP achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CORP has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 2.89%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.61% annualized return.

CORP

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 4.97%
• 3Y*: 4.93%
• 5Y*: 1.05%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

LQD

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 4.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: 0.09%
• 10Y*: 2.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORP vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CORP

PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF

LQD

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

CORP vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CORP

CORP Risk / Return Rank: 57
CORP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CORP Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CORP Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CORP Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
CORP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

LQD

LQD Risk / Return Rank: 46
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 37
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CORP vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (CORP) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CORP	LQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.74	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.04	+0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.14	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.50	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.39	4.15	+1.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CORP vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CORP Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORP and LQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CORP	LQD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	0.74	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.01	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.30	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.54	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CORP and LQD is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CORP vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

CORP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than LQD's 4.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CORP PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF	4.86%	4.77%	4.74%	4.12%	3.28%	2.51%	2.90%	3.25%	3.18%	3.08%	2.91%	3.14%
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.52%	4.48%	4.45%	3.99%	3.30%	2.30%	2.66%	3.29%	3.67%	3.10%	3.34%	3.47%

Drawdowns

CORP vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORP drawdown since its inception was -21.21%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORP and LQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CORP	LQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.21%	-24.95%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-3.38%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.21%	-24.95%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.21%	-24.95%	+3.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-4.52%	+2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-3.99%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	1.22%	-0.26%

Volatility

CORP vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (CORP) is 1.95%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that CORP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CORP	LQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	2.65%	-0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	3.76%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	6.60%	-1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.87%	8.66%	-1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.07%	8.67%	-1.60%