PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CORP.L vs. LQDH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CORP.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LQDH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORP.L achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH.L's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CORP.L has underperformed LQDH.L with an annualized return of 1.92%, while LQDH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 4.41% annualized return.


CORP.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.98%
6M
-0.32%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
1.92%

LQDH.L

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.21%
6M
2.01%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
4.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CORP.L
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.60%9.82%1.37%8.71%-16.01%-3.28%9.89%11.61%-3.91%8.76%
LQDH.L
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.46%4.93%8.27%11.54%0.28%0.92%0.77%10.76%-2.64%4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CORP.L and LQDH.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2013

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CORP.L
CORP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CORP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CORP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CORP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CORP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CORP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDH.L
LQDH.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LQDH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CORP.L) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LQDH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CORP.LLQDH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

3.30

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

11.26

-8.99

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CORP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the LQDH.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORP.L and LQDH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.09%, which is greater than LQDH.L's maximum drawdown of -23.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORP.L and LQDH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CORP.LLQDH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.09%

-23.77%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.55%

-1.39%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.01%

-2.81%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.80%

-6.42%

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.09%

-23.77%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-0.34%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-1.46%

-3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.41%

+0.89%

Volatility

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CORP.L) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LQDH.L) at 0.84%. This indicates that CORP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CORP.LLQDH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.84%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

2.19%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.91%

3.18%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.98%

4.87%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.72%

6.41%

+0.31%

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CORP.L vs. LQDH.L - Dividend Comparison

CORP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than LQDH.L's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CORP.L
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.28%4.05%3.98%3.22%2.60%2.13%2.28%2.67%2.71%2.48%2.73%2.68%
LQDH.L
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.33%4.66%5.52%4.83%2.07%1.55%2.45%3.52%2.87%2.14%2.46%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


CORP.L and LQDH.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CORP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CORP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.L.

CORP.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Index (USD), while LQDH.L tracks IBOXX US Dollar Liquid Investment Grade IR Hedged Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CORP.L and 0.25% for LQDH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CORP.L and LQDH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer