CORN vs. SUPP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) and SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CORN is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark, while SUPP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by TCW. CORN is passively managed, while SUPP is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CORN returned -12.86%/yr vs 19.00%/yr for SUPP. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. CORN charges 2.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SUPP.

Performance

CORN vs. SUPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORN achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than SUPP's 23.92% return.

CORN

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -6.77%
• YTD: -4.40%
• 6M: -6.20%
• 1Y: -3.69%
• 3Y*: -12.86%
• 5Y*: -2.46%
• 10Y*: -2.29%

SUPP

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: 23.92%
• 6M: 22.48%
• 1Y: 31.72%
• 3Y*: 19.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORN vs. SUPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund	-4.40%	-5.54%	-12.98%	-19.24%
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	23.92%	11.65%	10.95%	12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CORN and SUPP is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023	-0.03

The correlation between CORN and SUPP shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CORN vs. SUPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CORN

CORN Risk / Return Rank: 7
CORN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CORN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CORN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CORN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CORN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SUPP

SUPP Risk / Return Rank: 52
SUPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SUPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SUPP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SUPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SUPP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CORN vs. SUPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CORN	SUPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	1.51	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.23	2.13	-2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.27	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	2.34	-2.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.81	9.51	-10.32

CORN vs. SUPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CORN Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the SUPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORN and SUPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CORN vs. SUPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORN drawdown since its inception was -78.09%, which is greater than SUPP's maximum drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORN and SUPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CORN	SUPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.09%	-25.03%	-53.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.08%	-13.59%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.97%	-25.03%	-8.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.82%	-1.60%	-66.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.13%	-4.36%	-46.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.56%	3.34%	+1.22%

Volatility

CORN vs. SUPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) is 4.79%, while TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that CORN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CORN	SUPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	9.32%	-4.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	18.18%	-6.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.41%	21.10%	-5.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.72%	19.86%	-0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	19.86%	-0.54%

CORN vs. SUPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORN has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SUPP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CORN vs. SUPP - Dividend Comparison

CORN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SUPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	0.28%	0.35%	0.49%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CORN and SUPP in my portfolio?

CORN and SUPP have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CORN or SUPP?

SUPP has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to CORN (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORN dropped -78.09% vs SUPP's -25.03%.

Which ETF is better, CORN or SUPP?

On 3-year performance, SUPP leads with 19.00% vs -12.86% for CORN. On fees, SUPP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CORN has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CORN or SUPP?

Over the 3-year period, SUPP has performed better with a 19.00% return vs -12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CORN or SUPP?

SUPP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.19% for CORN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CORN or SUPP?

SUPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for CORN.

What is the main difference between CORN and SUPP?

CORN is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while SUPP is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and TCW. Their fees differ too: 2.19% for CORN and 0.75% for SUPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SUPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.