CORN vs. IWM
CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CORN is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CORN returned -3.32%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for IWM. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CORN charges 2.19%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
CORN vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORN achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CORN has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of -3.32%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.
CORN
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 6M
- -5.35%
- 1Y
- -8.65%
- 3Y*
- -11.42%
- 5Y*
- -5.46%
- 10Y*
- -3.32%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 41.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
CORN vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | -5.25% | -5.54% | -12.98% | -19.90% | 25.02% | 38.25% | 5.27% | -7.79% | -4.28% | -10.38% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 19.22% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORN and IWM is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2010 | 0.07 |
The correlation between CORN and IWM shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORN vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
CORN
IWM
CORN vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORN | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.33 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 3.57 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | 12.63 | -14.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORN vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORN drawdown since its inception was -78.09%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORN and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORN | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.09% | -59.05% | -19.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.55% | -11.03% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.57% | -27.50% | -11.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.39% | -31.91% | -12.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.10% | -41.13% | -9.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.10% | 0.00% | -68.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.10% | -10.76% | -40.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 3.12% | +1.60% |
Volatility
CORN vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) is 5.93%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that CORN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORN | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 7.16% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 14.29% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.42% | 19.73% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 22.61% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 23.08% | -3.68% |
CORN vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORN has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CORN vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
CORN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORN and IWM have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to CORN (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORN dropped -78.09% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 11.27% vs -3.32% for CORN. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CORN has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 11.27% return vs -3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.19% for CORN.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for CORN.
CORN is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. CORN tracks Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.19% for CORN and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CORN and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer