CORN vs. FLUD
CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) and FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CORN is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark, while FLUD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. CORN is passively managed, while FLUD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CORN returned -3.99%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for FLUD. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CORN charges 2.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLUD.
Performance
CORN vs. FLUD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORN achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than FLUD's 1.53% return.
CORN
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -1.91%
- 1Y
- -4.06%
- 3Y*
- -9.83%
- 5Y*
- -3.99%
- 10Y*
- -2.61%
FLUD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- —
CORN vs. FLUD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | -1.47% | -5.54% | -12.98% | -19.90% | 25.02% | 38.25% | 29.73% |
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.53% | 5.36% | 5.44% | 5.95% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORN and FLUD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020 | -0.05 |
The correlation between CORN and FLUD shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORN vs. FLUD — Risk / Return Rank
CORN
FLUD
CORN vs. FLUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CORN | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.60 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 10.55 | -10.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 41.82 | -42.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CORN | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 2.76 | -3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 2.73 | -2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 2.59 | -2.68 |
Drawdowns
CORN vs. FLUD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORN drawdown since its inception was -78.09%, which is greater than FLUD's maximum drawdown of -1.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORN and FLUD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORN | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.09% | -1.66% | -76.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -0.44% | -9.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.57% | -0.59% | -37.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.39% | -1.66% | -42.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.83% | 0.00% | -66.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.08% | -0.24% | -50.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 0.11% | +5.07% |
Volatility
CORN vs. FLUD - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) at 0.33%. This indicates that CORN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORN | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 0.33% | +6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 0.74% | +10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 1.68% | +13.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 1.34% | +18.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 1.26% | +18.14% |
CORN vs. FLUD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORN has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLUD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CORN vs. FLUD - Dividend Comparison
CORN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.27% | 4.51% | 4.97% | 4.72% | 1.39% | 0.92% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORN and FLUD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CORN has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to FLUD (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORN dropped -78.09% vs FLUD's -1.66%.
On 5-year performance, FLUD leads with 3.63% vs -3.99% for CORN. On fees, FLUD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLUD has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLUD has performed better with a 3.63% return vs -3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLUD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 2.19% for CORN.
FLUD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 0.00% for CORN.
CORN is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while FLUD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 2.19% for CORN and 0.15% for FLUD.
FLUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CORN and FLUD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer