COR vs. IBTL
COR (Cencora Inc.) is a stock, while IBTL (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index. Over the past 3 years, COR returned 17.14%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for IBTL. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COR vs. IBTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COR achieves a -16.27% return, which is significantly lower than IBTL's -0.37% return.
COR
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- -16.27%
- 6M
- -18.27%
- 1Y
- -3.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- 20.65%
- 10Y*
- 17.47%
IBTL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COR vs. IBTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COR Cencora Inc. | -16.27% | 51.48% | 10.37% | 25.33% | 26.26% | 13.67% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | -0.37% | 7.85% | 0.36% | 3.60% | -15.60% | -1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between COR and IBTL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COR vs. IBTL — Risk / Return Rank
COR
IBTL
COR vs. IBTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cencora Inc. (COR) and iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COR | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.16 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.16 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 3.19 | -3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COR vs. IBTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COR drawdown since its inception was -71.01%, which is greater than IBTL's maximum drawdown of -20.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COR and IBTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COR | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.01% | -20.93% | -50.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.44% | -2.83% | -29.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.44% | -7.38% | -25.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.54% | -7.16% | -17.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -11.43% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.68% | 1.03% | +10.65% |
Volatility
COR vs. IBTL - Volatility Comparison
Cencora Inc. (COR) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) at 1.11%. This indicates that COR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COR | IBTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 1.11% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.93% | 2.41% | +24.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.20% | 3.50% | +26.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 7.44% | +14.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.48% | 7.44% | +20.04% |
Dividends
COR vs. IBTL - Dividend Comparison
COR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than IBTL's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COR Cencora Inc. | 0.83% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 1.13% | 5.13% | 6.74% | 7.48% | 2.07% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | 3.97% | 3.93% | 4.07% | 3.04% | 2.36% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COR and IBTL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COR has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to IBTL (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COR dropped -71.01% vs IBTL's -20.93%.
IBTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COR and IBTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer