PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPX vs. XGSD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COPX is traded in USD, while XGSD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XGSD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly higher than XGSD.L's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has outperformed XGSD.L with an annualized return of 21.86%, while XGSD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.


COPX

1D
3.38%
1M
-6.46%
YTD
19.75%
6M
29.13%
1Y
103.76%
3Y*
33.96%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*
21.86%

XGSD.L

1D
1.16%
1M
1.50%
YTD
13.43%
6M
15.09%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
19.75%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
13.43%34.98%7.28%8.25%-6.88%13.80%-0.45%20.89%-10.95%17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between COPX and XGSD.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.59

The correlation between COPX and XGSD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COPX
XGSD.L

Basic Materials

96.3%
5.8%

Industrials

3.7%
9.0%

Communication Services

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.1%

Energy

-

9.2%

Financial Services

-

40.7%

Healthcare

-

1.9%

Real Estate

-

7.2%

Technology

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

6.8%

Basic Materials

COPX
96.3%
XGSD.L
5.8%

Industrials

COPX
3.7%
XGSD.L
9.0%

Communication Services

COPX

-

XGSD.L
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

COPX

-

XGSD.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

COPX

-

XGSD.L
6.1%

Energy

COPX

-

XGSD.L
9.2%

Financial Services

COPX

-

XGSD.L
40.7%

Healthcare

COPX

-

XGSD.L
1.9%

Real Estate

COPX

-

XGSD.L
7.2%

Technology

COPX

-

XGSD.L
1.7%

Utilities

COPX

-

XGSD.L
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPX vs. XGSD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XGSD.L
XGSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPXXGSD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.52

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

5.46

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

18.81

-7.21

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the XGSD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPX and XGSD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than XGSD.L's maximum drawdown of -74.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and XGSD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPXXGSD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-74.54%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.82%

-5.62%

-22.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.72%

-12.18%

-27.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.12%

-25.51%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.41%

-39.60%

-25.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.17%

0.00%

-10.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.28%

-20.29%

-18.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.98%

1.64%

+7.34%

Volatility

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPXXGSD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.30%

2.96%

+16.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.15%

8.09%

+30.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.66%

10.57%

+33.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.00%

14.35%

+22.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.75%

16.00%

+19.75%

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XGSD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPX vs. XGSD.L - Dividend Comparison

COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than XGSD.L's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.24%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
XGSD.L
Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
4.11%4.60%6.38%7.51%8.71%4.76%5.34%4.30%4.68%3.56%2.74%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPX and XGSD.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGSD.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGSD.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

COPX is categorized as Materials, while XGSD.L is Global Equity Income. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while XGSD.L tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.50% for XGSD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPX and XGSD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer