PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPX vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COPX is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has outperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 18.38%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.83% annualized return.


COPX

1D
0.70%
1M
-13.30%
6M
-8.24%
YTD
3.23%
1Y
72.90%
3Y*
26.21%
5Y*
18.50%
10Y*
18.38%
ALL TIME*
5.35%

SWDA.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.10%
6M
8.65%
YTD
9.14%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
12.83%
ALL TIME*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
3.23%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.14%21.14%19.09%23.79%-18.13%22.52%15.68%27.97%-9.23%22.42%

Correlation

The correlation between COPX and SWDA.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.53

The correlation between COPX and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COPX
SWDA.L

Basic Materials

96.9%
3.1%

Industrials

3.1%
11.1%

Communication Services

-

8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.8%

Financial Services

-

16.3%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

-

30.3%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Basic Materials

COPX
96.9%
SWDA.L
3.1%

Industrials

COPX
3.1%
SWDA.L
11.1%

Communication Services

COPX

-

SWDA.L
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

COPX

-

SWDA.L
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

COPX

-

SWDA.L
4.9%

Energy

COPX

-

SWDA.L
3.8%

Financial Services

COPX

-

SWDA.L
16.3%

Healthcare

COPX

-

SWDA.L
8.9%

Real Estate

COPX

-

SWDA.L
1.7%

Technology

COPX

-

SWDA.L
30.3%

Utilities

COPX

-

SWDA.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPX vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPXSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.36

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

10.05

-3.17

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPX and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPXSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-45.69%

-37.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.82%

-8.59%

-19.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.72%

-17.07%

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.12%

-26.50%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.41%

-33.61%

-31.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.56%

-1.35%

-21.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-11.14%

-28.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.63%

2.03%

+8.60%

Volatility

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 13.65% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.97%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPXSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.65%

2.97%

+10.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.63%

9.14%

+30.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.47%

11.71%

+33.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.21%

15.31%

+21.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.81%

15.69%

+20.12%

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPX vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.61%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPX and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

COPX is categorized as Copper, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPX and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer