COPX vs. LYM9.DE
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while LYM9.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COPX returned 18.38%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for LYM9.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LYM9.DE.
Performance
COPX vs. LYM9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COPX is traded in USD, while LYM9.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYM9.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than LYM9.DE's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has outperformed LYM9.DE with an annualized return of 18.38%, while LYM9.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.
COPX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -13.30%
- 6M
- -8.24%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 72.90%
- 3Y*
- 26.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.50%
- 10Y*
- 18.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.35%
LYM9.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -11.42%
- 6M
- 16.71%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 1Y
- 51.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.49%
COPX vs. LYM9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 3.23% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 23.32% | 46.35% | -13.24% | -18.68% | -17.91% | -6.84% | 60.36% | 46.87% | -13.44% | 32.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and LYM9.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.51 |
The correlation between COPX and LYM9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. LYM9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
LYM9.DE
COPX vs. LYM9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPX | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 4.01 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 13.38 | -6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPX vs. LYM9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than LYM9.DE's maximum drawdown of -75.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and LYM9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -75.58% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -12.75% | -15.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -39.69% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -57.00% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | -57.86% | -7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.56% | -12.32% | -10.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -48.89% | +9.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.63% | 3.83% | +6.80% |
Volatility
COPX vs. LYM9.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 13.65% compared to Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) at 8.88%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYM9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | LYM9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.65% | 8.88% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.63% | 19.77% | +19.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.47% | 23.53% | +21.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.21% | 24.78% | +12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.81% | 23.39% | +12.42% |
COPX vs. LYM9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LYM9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. LYM9.DE - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than LYM9.DE's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.61% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.74% | 0.78% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.70% | 1.12% | 0.67% | 0.89% | 1.50% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and LYM9.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYM9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYM9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX is categorized as Copper, while LYM9.DE is Energy Equities. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
Find the right allocation for COPX and LYM9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer