COPX vs. IDVO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while IDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. COPX is passively managed, while IDVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, COPX returned 33.96%/yr vs 22.78%/yr for IDVO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

COPX vs. IDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly higher than IDVO's 14.60% return.

COPX

• 1D: 3.38%
• 1M: -6.46%
• YTD: 19.75%
• 6M: 29.13%
• 1Y: 103.76%
• 3Y*: 33.96%
• 5Y*: 19.28%
• 10Y*: 21.86%

IDVO

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 14.60%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 34.09%
• 3Y*: 22.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPX vs. IDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	19.75%	93.50%	3.57%	8.38%	22.18%
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	14.60%	36.46%	10.16%	17.53%	6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between COPX and IDVO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022	0.74

The correlation between COPX and IDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

COPX vs. IDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COPX	IDVO
Basic Materials	96.3%	15.7%
Industrials	3.7%	9.8%
Communication Services	-	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.5%
Energy	-	12.1%
Financial Services	-	18.3%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	8.7%
Utilities	-	6.4%

Return for Risk

COPX vs. IDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPX

COPX Risk / Return Rank: 76
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

IDVO

IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 75
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPX vs. IDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPX	IDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.09	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.81	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.38	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	3.30	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.60	12.60	-1.00

COPX vs. IDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the IDVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPX and IDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COPX vs. IDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than IDVO's maximum drawdown of -15.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and IDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPX	IDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-15.46%	-67.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.82%	-10.37%	-17.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.72%	-15.46%	-24.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.17%	-0.84%	-9.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.28%	-2.30%	-36.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.98%	2.71%	+6.27%

Volatility

COPX vs. IDVO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) at 6.41%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPX	IDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.30%	6.41%	+12.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.15%	13.94%	+24.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.66%	16.40%	+27.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.00%	16.50%	+20.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.75%	16.50%	+19.25%

COPX vs. IDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COPX and IDVO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

COPX vs. IDVO - Dividend Comparison

COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than IDVO's 5.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	2.24%	2.68%	1.80%	2.39%	3.14%	1.48%	1.30%	1.37%	2.59%	1.57%	0.60%	1.20%
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	5.46%	5.42%	6.14%	5.72%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPX and IDVO in my portfolio?

COPX and IDVO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COPX or IDVO?

COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to IDVO (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs IDVO's -15.46%.

Which ETF is better, COPX or IDVO?

On 3-year performance, COPX leads with 33.96% vs 22.78% for IDVO. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, IDVO has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COPX or IDVO?

Over the 3-year period, COPX has performed better with a 33.96% return vs 22.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPX or IDVO?

COPX and IDVO have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPX or IDVO?

IDVO has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 2.24% for COPX.

What is the main difference between COPX and IDVO?

COPX is categorized as Materials, while IDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.