COPX vs. ARKW
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. COPX is passively managed, while ARKW is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, COPX returned 21.97%/yr vs 22.86%/yr for ARKW. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.
Performance
COPX vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 25.10% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's -0.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with COPX having a 21.97% annualized return and ARKW not far ahead at 22.86%.
COPX
- 1D
- 4.47%
- 1M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 25.10%
- 6M
- 33.68%
- 1Y
- 115.49%
- 3Y*
- 34.51%
- 5Y*
- 22.46%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
ARKW
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- -1.16%
- 1Y
- 15.15%
- 3Y*
- 37.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.86%
COPX vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.10% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -0.20% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and ARKW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.43 |
COPX vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COPX
ARKW
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
COPX
ARKW
-
Industrials
COPX
ARKW
Communication Services
COPX
-
ARKW
Consumer Cyclical
COPX
-
ARKW
Consumer Defensive
COPX
-
ARKW
-
Energy
COPX
-
ARKW
-
Financial Services
COPX
-
ARKW
Healthcare
COPX
-
ARKW
-
Real Estate
COPX
-
ARKW
-
Technology
COPX
-
ARKW
Utilities
COPX
-
ARKW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
ARKW
COPX vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPX | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.10 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 0.42 | +3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | 0.85 | +12.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPX vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and ARKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -80.52% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -36.21% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -36.21% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -77.36% | +35.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | -80.52% | +15.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -20.01% | +13.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.27% | -23.97% | -15.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 17.93% | -8.95% |
Volatility
COPX vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.66% compared to ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) at 11.21%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.66% | 11.21% | +8.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.37% | 24.94% | +13.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.92% | 33.21% | +10.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.00% | 43.64% | -6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.76% | 37.77% | -2.01% |
COPX vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than ARKW's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.59% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.14% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and ARKW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.66%) compared to ARKW (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs ARKW's -80.52%.
On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.86% vs 21.97% for COPX. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 11.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 21.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.59% for ARKW.
COPX is categorized as Copper, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.76% for ARKW.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPX and ARKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer