COPR.TO vs. COPJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COPR.TO (Coppernico Metals Inc.) is a stock, while COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. Over the past year, COPR.TO returned 80.95% vs 126.50% for COPJ. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

COPR.TO vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Coppernico Metals Inc. (COPR.TO) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

COPR.TO is traded in CAD, while COPJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPR.TO achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than COPJ's 16.69% return.

COPR.TO

• 1D: -5.00%
• 1M: -10.59%
• YTD: -2.56%
• 6M: 31.03%
• 1Y: 80.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COPJ

• 1D: -4.10%
• 1M: 15.93%
• YTD: 16.69%
• 6M: 29.53%
• 1Y: 126.50%
• 3Y*: 47.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPR.TO vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
COPR.TO Coppernico Metals Inc.	-2.56%	56.00%	-25.37%
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	16.69%	129.59%	5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between COPR.TO and COPJ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

COPR.TO vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPR.TO

COPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
COPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
COPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
COPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
COPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
COPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

COPJ

COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 73
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPR.TO vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coppernico Metals Inc. (COPR.TO) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COPR.TO	COPJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	3.11	-2.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	3.30	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.46	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	4.09	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.66	12.36	-7.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COPR.TO vs. COPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the COPJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPR.TO and COPJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COPR.TO	COPJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	3.11	-2.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	1.22	-1.15

Drawdowns

COPR.TO vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.51%, which is greater than COPJ's maximum drawdown of -31.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPR.TO and COPJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPR.TO	COPJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.51%	-31.14%	-44.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.19%	-31.14%	-14.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.92%	-9.29%	-17.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.93%	-10.86%	-31.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.81%	10.28%	+7.53%

Volatility

COPR.TO vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison

Coppernico Metals Inc. (COPR.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.16% compared to Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) at 15.41%. This indicates that COPR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPR.TO	COPJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.16%	15.41%	+3.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.29%	33.99%	+36.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.95%	40.93%	+56.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	99.11%	32.65%	+66.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.11%	32.65%	+66.46%

Dividends

COPR.TO vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison

COPR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	10.04%	11.57%	11.64%	2.48%
COPR.TO Coppernico Metals Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPR.TO and COPJ in my portfolio?

COPR.TO and COPJ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.