COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Coppernico Metals Inc. (COPR.TO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO).

Performance

COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Coppernico Metals Inc. (COPR.TO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
COPR.TO Coppernico Metals Inc.	-7.69%	56.00%	-25.37%
HBM.TO Hudbay Minerals Inc.	6.93%	134.08%	16.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPR.TO achieves a -7.69% return, which is significantly lower than HBM.TO's 6.93% return.

COPR.TO

• 1D: 16.13%
• 1M: -21.74%
• YTD: -7.69%
• 6M: 84.62%
• 1Y: 111.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HBM.TO

• 1D: 9.80%
• 1M: -24.61%
• YTD: 6.93%
• 6M: 38.23%
• 1Y: 167.25%
• 3Y*: 60.46%
• 5Y*: 26.45%
• 10Y*: 20.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPR.TO

COPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
COPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
COPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
COPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
COPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
COPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

HBM.TO

HBM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
HBM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HBM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HBM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HBM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
HBM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coppernico Metals Inc. (COPR.TO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COPR.TO	HBM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	3.10	-1.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.26	-1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.44	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	4.60	-2.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.16	16.88	-11.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the HBM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPR.TO and HBM.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COPR.TO	HBM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	3.10	-1.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.00	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between COPR.TO and HBM.TO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO - Dividend Comparison

COPR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPR.TO Coppernico Metals Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HBM.TO Hudbay Minerals Inc.	0.07%	0.07%	0.17%	0.27%	0.29%	0.22%	0.22%	0.37%	0.31%	0.18%	0.26%	0.38%

Drawdowns

COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.51%, smaller than the maximum HBM.TO drawdown of -92.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPR.TO and HBM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPR.TO	HBM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.51%	-92.86%	+17.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.19%	-35.94%	-9.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-62.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-84.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.77%	-24.61%	-6.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.95%	-62.58%	+18.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.32%	9.79%	+8.53%

Volatility

COPR.TO vs. HBM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Coppernico Metals Inc. (COPR.TO) has a higher volatility of 34.80% compared to Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) at 21.05%. This indicates that COPR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPR.TO	HBM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.80%	21.05%	+13.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.45%	40.39%	+29.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	101.52%	54.36%	+47.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	99.43%	51.71%	+47.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.43%	55.99%	+43.44%

Financials