PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc) (JRZE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COPM.AS is traded in USD, while JRZE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRZE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPM.AS achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than JRZE.L's 7.40% return.


COPM.AS

1D
-2.44%
1M
16.46%
YTD
27.79%
6M
38.45%
1Y
110.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JRZE.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.53%
YTD
7.40%
6M
10.19%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COPM.AS
iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF
27.79%82.17%0.45%4.71%
JRZE.L
JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc)
7.40%39.74%1.62%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between COPM.AS and JRZE.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023

0.53

The correlation between COPM.AS and JRZE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPM.AS
COPM.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
COPM.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPM.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPM.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
COPM.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPM.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

JRZE.L
JRZE.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
JRZE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRZE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRZE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
JRZE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRZE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc) (JRZE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPM.ASJRZE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.23

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

1.66

+2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

5.87

+9.68

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPM.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the JRZE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPM.AS and JRZE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPM.ASJRZE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

1.26

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.78

+0.35

Drawdowns

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPM.AS drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, which is greater than JRZE.L's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPM.AS and JRZE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPM.ASJRZE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.12%

-23.32%

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.05%

-12.45%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-0.99%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.55%

-6.37%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.98%

3.53%

+3.45%

Volatility

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) has a higher volatility of 14.68% compared to JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (acc) (JRZE.L) at 5.41%. This indicates that COPM.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRZE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPM.ASJRZE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.68%

5.41%

+9.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.95%

13.38%

+18.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.22%

16.44%

+20.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.34%

22.16%

+12.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.34%

22.16%

+12.18%

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPM.AS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JRZE.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPM.AS vs. JRZE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COPM.AS nor JRZE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COPM.AS and JRZE.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JRZE.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JRZE.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for COPM.AS.

COPM.AS is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while JRZE.L is Europe Equities. COPM.AS tracks STOXX Global Copper Miners Index, while JRZE.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for COPM.AS and 0.25% for JRZE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPM.AS and JRZE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer