PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPJ vs. SPPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPJ vs. SPPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COPJ is traded in USD, while SPPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPJ achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP.L's -22.18% return.


COPJ

1D
2.38%
1M
-11.17%
YTD
0.79%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
82.49%
3Y*
38.25%
5Y*
10Y*

SPPP.L

1D
-1.72%
1M
-19.09%
YTD
-22.18%
6M
-29.47%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
3.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPJ vs. SPPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
0.79%140.63%11.07%-6.47%
SPPP.L
Invesco Physical Platinum
-22.18%120.27%-9.95%-0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and SPPP.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.48

The correlation between COPJ and SPPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPJ vs. SPPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SPPP.L
SPPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPJ vs. SPPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPJSPPP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.10

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

0.37

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

0.83

+5.89

COPJ vs. SPPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and SPPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. SPPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum SPPP.L drawdown of -62.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and SPPP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPJSPPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-62.33%

+30.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.28%

-45.13%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.28%

-45.13%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.96%

-45.13%

+22.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-34.84%

+22.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.33%

20.11%

-7.78%

Volatility

COPJ vs. SPPP.L - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a higher volatility of 18.91% compared to Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) at 10.96%. This indicates that COPJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPJSPPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.91%

10.96%

+7.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.69%

41.26%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.95%

47.76%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.66%

32.49%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.66%

29.35%

+6.31%

COPJ vs. SPPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SPPP.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPJ vs. SPPP.L - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, while SPPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
11.48%11.57%11.64%2.48%
SPPP.L
Invesco Physical Platinum
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPJ and SPPP.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPPP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPPP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

COPJ is categorized as Copper, while SPPP.L is Precious Metals. COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while SPPP.L tracks Platinum. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.19% for SPPP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPJ and SPPP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer