COPJ vs. SLVR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) and SLVR (Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPJ is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while SLVR is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COPJ returned 79.19% vs 64.28% for SLVR. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. COPJ charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SLVR.

Performance

COPJ vs. SLVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

COPJ

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -1.50%
• 6M: -14.72%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 79.19%
• 3Y*: 34.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.01%

SLVR

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: -8.51%
• 6M: -24.99%
• YTD: -14.48%
• 1Y: 64.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 72.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	$2.16M	$2.22M	$3.49M
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	$4.41M	$4.75M	$8.71M

COPJ vs. SLVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	0.00%	138.37%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	-14.48%	171.53%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and SLVR is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	0.68

The correlation between COPJ and SLVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

COPJ vs. SLVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COPJ

COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 68
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 70
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SLVR

SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 40
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COPJ vs. SLVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPJ	SLVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.00	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	1.53	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.20	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	1.48	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.76	2.95	+2.81

COPJ vs. SLVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the SLVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and SLVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. SLVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum SLVR drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and SLVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPJ	SLVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.28%	-43.70%	+11.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.28%	-43.70%	+11.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.56%	-42.75%	+19.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.38%	-12.30%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.14%	21.92%	-7.78%

Volatility

COPJ vs. SLVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) is 12.84%, while Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a volatility of 15.28%. This indicates that COPJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPJ	SLVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.84%	15.28%	-2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.35%	52.83%	-13.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.09%	64.91%	-18.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.86%	58.41%	-22.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.86%	58.41%	-22.55%

COPJ vs. SLVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPJ vs. SLVR - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than SLVR's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	11.57%	11.57%	11.64%	2.48%
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	4.31%	3.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPJ and SLVR in my portfolio?

COPJ and SLVR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COPJ or SLVR?

SLVR has higher volatility (15.28%) compared to COPJ (12.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPJ dropped -32.28% vs SLVR's -43.70%.

Which ETF is better, COPJ or SLVR?

On 1-year performance, COPJ leads with 79.19% vs 64.28% for SLVR. On fees, SLVR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, COPJ has been the lower-risk option at 12.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COPJ or SLVR?

Over the 1-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 79.19% return vs 64.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPJ or SLVR?

SLVR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPJ or SLVR?

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 11.57%, compared with 4.31% for SLVR.

What is the main difference between COPJ and SLVR?

COPJ is categorized as Copper, while SLVR is Silver. COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while SLVR tracks Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.65% for SLVR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.