PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPJ vs. PL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPJ vs. PL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPJ achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 68.00% return.


COPJ

1D
2.38%
1M
-11.17%
YTD
0.79%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
82.49%
3Y*
38.25%
5Y*
10Y*

PL

1D
5.91%
1M
-35.22%
YTD
68.00%
6M
67.83%
1Y
443.11%
3Y*
117.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPJ vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
0.79%140.63%11.07%-6.47%
PL
Planet Labs PBC
68.00%388.12%63.56%-49.69%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and PL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPJ vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PL
PL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPJ vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPJPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.53

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

9.15

-6.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

28.19

-21.48

COPJ vs. PL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the PL Sharpe Ratio of 4.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and PL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum PL drawdown of -85.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and PL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPJPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-85.11%

+52.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.28%

-48.83%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.28%

-55.17%

+22.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.96%

-35.54%

+12.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-55.27%

+43.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.33%

15.82%

-3.49%

Volatility

COPJ vs. PL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) is 18.91%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 41.66%. This indicates that COPJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPJPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.91%

41.66%

-22.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.69%

73.65%

-34.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.95%

103.54%

-58.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.66%

85.01%

-49.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.66%

85.01%

-49.35%

Dividends

COPJ vs. PL - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, while PL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
11.48%11.57%11.64%2.48%
PL
Planet Labs PBC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPJ and PL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PL has higher volatility (41.66%) compared to COPJ (18.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPJ dropped -32.28% vs PL's -85.11%.

PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPJ and PL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer