PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPG.L vs. URNU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COPG.L vs. URNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COPG.L vs. URNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
COPG.L
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc
9.97%82.05%3.66%3.03%3.11%
URNU.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc
19.68%58.33%2.99%32.92%3.46%
Different Trading Currencies

COPG.L is traded in GBP, while URNU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URNU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPG.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than URNU.L's 19.68% return.


COPG.L

1D
6.05%
1M
-14.87%
YTD
9.97%
6M
35.56%
1Y
99.44%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
10Y*

URNU.L

1D
6.97%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
19.68%
6M
9.35%
1Y
128.40%
3Y*
39.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COPG.L vs. URNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COPG.L and URNU.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

COPG.L vs. URNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPG.L
COPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
COPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
COPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

URNU.L
URNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
URNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
URNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPG.L vs. URNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPG.LURNU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

2.59

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

3.07

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

4.16

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.49

10.97

+4.53

COPG.L vs. URNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the URNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPG.L and URNU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPG.LURNU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.59

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.88

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between COPG.L and URNU.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

COPG.L vs. URNU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COPG.L nor URNU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

COPG.L vs. URNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, roughly equal to the maximum URNU.L drawdown of -39.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPG.L and URNU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COPG.LURNU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.84%

-38.62%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.29%

-33.08%

+6.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.93%

-16.39%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-10.88%

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

12.68%

-6.11%

Volatility

COPG.L vs. URNU.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) has a higher volatility of 16.02% compared to Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) at 14.46%. This indicates that COPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COPG.LURNU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.02%

14.46%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.87%

39.00%

-8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.62%

49.34%

-11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.37%

39.40%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.37%

39.40%

-6.03%