COPG.L vs. LITU.L
COPG.L (Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc) and LITU.L (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds from Global X - COPG.L tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index while LITU.L tracks the Solactive Global Lithium v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, COPG.L returned 34.51%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for LITU.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COPG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LITU.L.
Performance
COPG.L vs. LITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COPG.L is traded in GBP, while LITU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPG.L achieves a 24.91% return, which is significantly lower than LITU.L's 27.12% return.
COPG.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 15.82%
- YTD
- 24.91%
- 6M
- 35.76%
- 1Y
- 119.81%
- 3Y*
- 34.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITU.L
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 27.12%
- 6M
- 32.79%
- 1Y
- 125.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPG.L vs. LITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc | 24.91% | 82.05% | 3.66% | 3.03% | 14.35% | -1.92% |
LITU.L Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc | 27.12% | 47.95% | -18.61% | -15.23% | -21.60% | -7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPG.L and LITU.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between COPG.L and LITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPG.L vs. LITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
COPG.L
LITU.L
COPG.L vs. LITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (LITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPG.L | LITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.60 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 11.08 | -6.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.57 | 33.13 | -18.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPG.L | LITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 4.12 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | -0.03 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
COPG.L vs. LITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum LITU.L drawdown of -61.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPG.L and LITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPG.L | LITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.84% | -61.87% | +23.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.29% | -11.22% | -15.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.84% | -51.18% | +12.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -8.41% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -32.91% | +18.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.19% | 3.76% | +4.43% |
Volatility
COPG.L vs. LITU.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (LITU.L) at 9.47%. This indicates that COPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPG.L | LITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.11% | 9.47% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.19% | 20.78% | +11.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.96% | 30.24% | +7.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 29.01% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 29.01% | +4.81% |
COPG.L vs. LITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LITU.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPG.L vs. LITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPG.L nor LITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COPG.L and LITU.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LITU.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LITU.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPG.L.
COPG.L tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while LITU.L tracks Solactive Global Lithium v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPG.L and 0.60% for LITU.L.
Find the right allocation for COPG.L and LITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer