CONY vs. TSLY
CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -42.39% vs 24.54% for TSLY. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CONY vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -25.27% return, which is significantly lower than TSLY's -1.68% return.
CONY
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -16.66%
- YTD
- -25.27%
- 6M
- -35.82%
- 1Y
- -42.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -25.27% | -26.34% | 23.62% | 81.04% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.68% | 13.62% | 27.83% | -0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONY and TSLY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2023 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONY vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
CONY
TSLY
CONY vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CONY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | 0.65 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | 1.05 | -1.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.14 | -1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 2.75 | -3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CONY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 | 0.65 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.30 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
CONY vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than TSLY's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.57% | -49.52% | -14.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -21.64% | -41.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.66% | -8.07% | -49.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.17% | -20.00% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.68% | 9.10% | +28.58% |
Volatility
CONY vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.87% compared to YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) at 9.96%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.87% | 9.96% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.66% | 22.37% | +21.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.29% | 38.18% | +20.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.06% | 45.50% | +14.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.06% | 45.50% | +14.56% |
CONY vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CONY and TSLY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CONY vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 189.23%, more than TSLY's 83.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 189.23% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.79% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONY and TSLY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to TSLY (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 24.54% vs -42.39% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLY has been the lower-risk option at 9.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 24.54% return vs -42.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CONY and TSLY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 189.23%, compared with 83.79% for TSLY.
CONY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLY is Options Trading.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONY and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer