CONY vs. TSLY
CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -56.86% vs 28.69% for TSLY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CONY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TSLY.
Performance
CONY vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -27.89% return, which is significantly lower than TSLY's -6.62% return.
CONY
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -32.20%
- YTD
- -27.89%
- 1Y
- -56.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -6.62%
- 1Y
- 28.69%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -27.89% | -26.34% | 23.62% | 76.18% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -6.62% | 13.62% | 27.83% | -3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONY and TSLY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONY vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
CONY
TSLY
CONY vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.15 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 1.33 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 3.08 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONY vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than TSLY's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.57% | -49.52% | -14.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -21.64% | -41.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.15% | -12.69% | -46.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.48% | -19.75% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.09% | 9.34% | +32.75% |
Volatility
CONY vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) have volatilities of 13.98% and 14.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONY | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.98% | 14.20% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.20% | 25.91% | +19.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.78% | 36.19% | +21.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.76% | 45.64% | +14.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.76% | 45.64% | +14.12% |
CONY vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONY vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 192.94%, more than TSLY's 85.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 192.94% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 85.55% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONY and TSLY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (14.20%) compared to CONY (13.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 28.69% vs -56.86% for CONY. On fees, CONY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CONY has been the lower-risk option at 13.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 28.69% return vs -56.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CONY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 192.94%, compared with 85.55% for TSLY.
CONY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CONY and 1.07% for TSLY.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONY and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer