CONY vs. MSTY
CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -36.44% vs -57.30% for MSTY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CONY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than MSTY's -8.55% return.
CONY
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- -36.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -8.50%
- 1M
- -20.82%
- YTD
- -8.55%
- 6M
- -19.25%
- 1Y
- -57.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -20.81% | -26.34% | 35.48% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.55% | -42.71% | 200.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONY and MSTY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CONY and MSTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
CONY
MSTY
CONY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CONY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | -0.96 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | -1.53 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.83 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | -0.79 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -1.22 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CONY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | -0.96 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.31 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
CONY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.57% | -71.79% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -71.79% | +8.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.14% | -64.04% | +8.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -26.01% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.50% | 46.68% | -9.18% |
Volatility
CONY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) have volatilities of 15.91% and 16.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.91% | 16.65% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.50% | 48.38% | -4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.03% | 60.11% | -2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 71.83% | -11.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 71.83% | -11.83% |
CONY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CONY and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CONY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 178.59%, less than MSTY's 251.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 178.59% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 251.24% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to CONY (15.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, CONY leads with -36.44% vs -57.30% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CONY has been the lower-risk option at 15.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CONY has performed better with a -36.44% return vs -57.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CONY and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 251.24%, compared with 178.59% for CONY.
CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONY and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer