CONY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -41.66% vs 5.55% for LQTI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CONY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

CONY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.63% return.

CONY

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -14.40%
• YTD: -24.78%
• 6M: -35.02%
• 1Y: -41.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-24.78%	-35.67%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.63%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CONY and LQTI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

CONY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 31
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CONY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	1.10	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	1.60	-2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.19	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	1.64	-2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.10	5.02	-6.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CONY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONY and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CONY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72	1.10	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.94	-0.81

Drawdowns

CONY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.57%	-3.41%	-60.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.39%	-3.41%	-59.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.39%	-0.97%	-56.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.22%	-0.88%	-21.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.85%	1.11%	+36.74%

Volatility

CONY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.89% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.67%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.89%	1.67%	+14.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.63%	4.04%	+39.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.14%	5.12%	+53.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.02%	5.97%	+54.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.02%	5.97%	+54.05%

CONY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 191.74%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	191.74%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONY and LQTI in my portfolio?

CONY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONY or LQTI?

CONY has higher volatility (15.89%) compared to LQTI (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, CONY or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, LQTI leads with 5.55% vs -41.66% for CONY. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CONY or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, LQTI has performed better with a 5.55% return vs -41.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CONY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONY or LQTI?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 191.74%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between CONY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CONY and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.