CONL vs. TSYX
CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) and TSYX (TSPY Lift ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CONL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for TSYX.
Performance
CONL vs. TSYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CONL
- 1D
- -8.24%
- 1M
- -13.92%
- 6M
- -68.86%
- YTD
- -65.80%
- 1Y
- -91.43%
- 3Y*
- -34.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONL vs. TSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | -71.89% |
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONL and TSYX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONL vs. TSYX — Risk / Return Rank
CONL
TSYX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CONL vs. TSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and TSPY Lift ETF (TSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONL | TSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONL vs. TSYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, which is greater than TSYX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and TSYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONL | TSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.20% | -13.39% | -81.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.12% | -1.85% | -92.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.06% | -2.90% | -54.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.73% | — | — |
Volatility
CONL vs. TSYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONL | TSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 134.45% | 18.37% | +116.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.18% | 18.37% | +130.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.18% | 18.37% | +130.81% |
CONL vs. TSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONL vs. TSYX - Dividend Comparison
CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.31% |
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONL and TSYX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSYX is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSYX is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.
TSYX has the higher dividend yield at 8.47%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and TappAlpha. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONL and 0.98% for TSYX.
Find the right allocation for CONL and TSYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer