CONL vs. TSYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) and TSYX (TSPY Lift ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CONL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for TSYX.

Performance

CONL vs. TSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and TSPY Lift ETF (TSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CONL

• 1D: -12.32%
• 1M: -38.47%
• YTD: -62.12%
• 6M: -75.31%
• 1Y: -79.34%
• 3Y*: -14.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSYX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONL vs. TSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-67.68%
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF	8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CONL and TSYX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026	0.51

Return for Risk

CONL vs. TSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONL vs. TSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and TSPY Lift ETF (TSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CONL	TSYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.65	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CONL	TSYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.20	1.28	-1.47

Drawdowns

CONL vs. TSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -93.95%, which is greater than TSYX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and TSYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONL	TSYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.95%	-13.39%	-80.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-92.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.48%	-0.16%	-93.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.95%	-2.97%	-52.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	65.74%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CONL	TSYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.40%	18.21%	+121.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.93%	18.21%	+131.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.93%	18.21%	+131.72%

CONL vs. TSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONL vs. TSYX - Dividend Comparison

CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF	6.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONL and TSYX in my portfolio?

CONL and TSYX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CONL or TSYX?

On fees, TSYX is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONL or TSYX?

TSYX is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONL or TSYX?

TSYX has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.

What is the main difference between CONL and TSYX?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and TappAlpha. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONL and 0.98% for TSYX.