CONL vs. TSDD

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONL returned -91.24% vs -63.23% for TSDD. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. CONL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.

Performance

CONL vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a -66.89% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's -1.29% return.

CONL

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -6.91%
• 6M: -70.98%
• YTD: -66.89%
• 1Y: -91.24%
• 3Y*: -35.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSDD

• 1D: 6.42%
• 1M: -1.80%
• 6M: -0.52%
• YTD: -1.29%
• 1Y: -63.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONL vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-66.89%	-58.49%	4.23%	222.32%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	-1.29%	-74.84%	-89.21%	-20.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CONL and TSDD is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	-0.41

CONL vs. TSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CONL	TSDD
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	200.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CONL vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

TSDD

TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONL vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CONL	TSDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	-0.71	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.59	-0.92	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.90	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	-0.91	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-1.16	-0.11

CONL vs. TSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONL Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the TSDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONL and TSDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CONL vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, roughly equal to the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and TSDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONL	TSDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.20%	-99.03%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.67%	-69.48%	-24.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-95.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.31%	-98.87%	+4.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.95%	-72.11%	+15.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	72.04%	54.62%	+17.42%

Volatility

CONL vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) is 33.61%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 35.65%. This indicates that CONL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONL	TSDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.61%	35.65%	-2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	104.56%	63.04%	+41.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.25%	89.62%	+44.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.29%	114.67%	+34.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.29%	114.67%	+34.62%

CONL vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONL vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison

CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%	0.00%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	8.53%	8.42%	0.00%	24.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONL and TSDD in my portfolio?

CONL and TSDD have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONL or TSDD?

TSDD has higher volatility (35.65%) compared to CONL (33.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONL dropped -95.20% vs TSDD's -99.03%.

Which ETF is better, CONL or TSDD?

On 1-year performance, TSDD leads with -63.23% vs -91.24% for CONL. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CONL has been the lower-risk option at 33.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CONL or TSDD?

Over the 1-year period, TSDD has performed better with a -63.23% return vs -91.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONL or TSDD?

TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONL or TSDD?

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.53%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.

What is the main difference between CONL and TSDD?

CONL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONL and 0.95% for TSDD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CONL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.