CONL vs. ORLG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) and ORLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CONL is actively managed, while ORLG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. CONL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ORLG.

Performance

CONL vs. ORLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CONL

• 1D: -8.24%
• 1M: -13.92%
• 6M: -68.86%
• YTD: -65.80%
• 1Y: -91.43%
• 3Y*: -34.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ORLG

• 1D: 8.37%
• 1M: -11.93%
• 6M: -23.86%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONL vs. ORLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-72.85%
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF	-25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CONL and ORLG is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	-0.10

Return for Risk

CONL vs. ORLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ORLG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONL vs. ORLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF (ORLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CONL	ORLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	—	—

Drawdowns

CONL vs. ORLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -95.20%, which is greater than ORLG's maximum drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and ORLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONL	ORLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.20%	-39.93%	-55.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-95.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.12%	-34.91%	-59.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.06%	-20.65%	-36.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	72.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CONL	ORLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	104.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.45%	59.08%	+75.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.18%	59.08%	+90.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.18%	59.08%	+90.10%

CONL vs. ORLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ORLG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONL vs. ORLG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CONL nor ORLG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%
ORLG Leverage Shares 2X Long ORLY Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONL and ORLG in my portfolio?

CONL and ORLG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CONL or ORLG?

On fees, ORLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONL or ORLG?

ORLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONL or ORLG?

CONL and ORLG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CONL and ORLG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONL and 0.75% for ORLG.